The question of women's access to information and communication technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa looked, in 2009, like several different questions depending on what "access" meant and what "ICTs" included. If the question was mobile telephone penetration, the answer was a story of rapid growth, with access rates in many countries approaching or surpassing 30 percent of the adult population and women's access closing on men's at a faster rate than almost any comparable technology had previously managed. If the question was internet access, the answer was a story of persistent asymmetry. If the question was access to research-grade connectivity, to computational infrastructure, to the networks of collaboration that defined twenty-first-century science, the answer was a story of structural exclusion that disproportionately affected women scientists in ways that received far less attention than the mobile-phone statistics.
These distinctions mattered for WIGSAT's audience — not consumers or mobile-banking users, but women engaged in or aspiring to scientific and technical careers. Access to a mobile handset did not translate into access to the international research literature. A PhD student at a Nairobi university who could not reliably access journal databases or maintain bandwidth-dependent research software was not equally situated to a counterpart in Johannesburg or London, regardless of whether she owned a mobile phone.
The ITU Data Landscape in 2009
The International Telecommunication Union's periodic reports on ICT access provided the most comprehensive international dataset available for this analysis. The 2009 figures showed mobile cellular subscriptions in Sub-Saharan Africa growing from roughly 2 percent of the population in 2000 to approximately 37 percent by 2008 — an extraordinary expansion that had reshaped the economic and social landscape across the region. Women's share of this subscriber base varied significantly by country and by income level within countries, but the general trajectory was one of convergence: the gender gap in mobile phone access was narrowing.
The internet figures told a different story. Internet penetration in Sub-Saharan Africa remained below 5 percent of the population in most countries in 2009, with the notable exceptions of South Africa and a handful of smaller, better-connected economies. Fixed broadband was rarer still, concentrated in urban centres and even there often available only at prices that represented a significant share of household income. The gender dimension of internet access was not well-tracked in ITU data at this point; what was known was that internet use in the region was concentrated in urban, educated, younger populations — and that women were under-represented in each of those categories relative to men.
Kenya: Mobile Growth and Research Infrastructure
Kenya's ICT story in 2009 was dominated by the mobile money narrative — M-Pesa had launched in 2007 and was by 2009 demonstrating that mobile platforms could deliver financial services at scale in a low-income economy. For women researchers and educators, however, the more relevant developments were at the university level, where access to international academic resources remained severely constrained. The Kenyan university system was expanding — several new public universities had been chartered or were under development — but the research infrastructure in existing institutions was uneven. Library journal subscriptions, when they existed at all, were typically limited; the INASP-supported PERI programme, which negotiated discounted access to journal databases for developing-country universities, was a meaningful intervention for those institutions that participated.
Women's representation in Kenya's university science faculties in 2009 was improving from a low baseline. The proportion of women in engineering and technology programmes at the University of Nairobi and Kenyatta University remained well below parity, a pattern consistent with East African regional data. The gender gap in science enrollment was attributable to both secondary-school pipeline effects — girls' secondary schools having historically received less investment in science laboratories and qualified teachers — and to the cultural framing of technical subjects as male. Neither problem was specific to Kenya, but the resource constraints meant that the interventions that had partially addressed the pipeline in wealthier countries were not as available.
South Africa: The Continental Outlier
South Africa occupied a category of its own in any regional comparison. Its university system was among the most developed on the continent, its research infrastructure was substantial by African standards, and its ICT penetration — particularly internet access — was markedly higher than the Sub-Saharan average. The CSIR (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) and the South African National Research Foundation were funding women's science programmes with a consistency that had no real parallel elsewhere in the region.
The complication was that South Africa's statistics masked severe internal inequality. Access to the relatively well-resourced historically white universities — Stellenbosch, Wits, UCT — was not equally available to women from all communities, and the historically Black institutions that served the majority of Black South African students had research infrastructure and faculty profiles that were incomparable to the leading research universities. A woman scientist at the University of Limpopo was in a fundamentally different situation from one at the University of Cape Town, and the aggregate "South African" figure concealed this.
Nigeria: Scale and Heterogeneity
Nigeria's sheer size made it a critical case: with a population approaching 150 million in 2009, Nigeria accounted for a substantial fraction of the continent's women scientists by simple arithmetic. Mobile penetration had grown dramatically, reaching levels that exceeded the Sub-Saharan average. Internet access was concentrated in Lagos and a handful of other major cities, and the quality of connectivity was extremely variable — bandwidth was scarce, expensive, and unreliable by the standards of the OECD world.
Women's participation in the university science and engineering sector in Nigeria reflected both the country's regional heterogeneity and its significant under-investment in education infrastructure. The federal universities varied considerably in quality and resource, and state universities more so. For women pursuing science careers, the constraints were compounded: beyond the standard structural barriers to women in technical fields, the chronic underfunding of Nigerian universities — which had produced waves of faculty strikes and periodic closures throughout the 1990s and 2000s — made sustained research careers difficult for anyone, with women bearing a proportionately greater share of the consequences of institutional instability.
The ICTs-in-Science Distinction
It is worth being precise about what this analysis is and is not. The rapid expansion of mobile telephony in Sub-Saharan Africa was a genuine development story with genuine benefits for women, including for women in education — mobile phones enabled access to information, to learning platforms operating over SMS, to the kind of practical coordination that reduced the transaction costs of daily life. None of this is in dispute.
What this analysis concerns is the specific form of ICT access that enables participation in international science: reliable, high-bandwidth internet connectivity; access to scientific databases; computational infrastructure for modelling and data analysis; the practical ability to collaborate in real time with researchers at institutions elsewhere in the world. These forms of access were, in 2009, extremely unevenly distributed across Sub-Saharan Africa, and the gender dimension of that unevenness was compounded by the gender dynamics within the university systems that controlled access to what connectivity existed.
The policy implication was not primarily about women's rights to own mobile phones — that battle was largely being won by the market. It was about the investment in research infrastructure, in university connectivity, in the STEM pipeline at the secondary and tertiary level, that would determine whether the next generation of African women scientists could participate on comparable terms in global research communities. That investment was, in 2009, significantly below what the continent's scientific potential required.
World Bank and Development Agency Perspectives
World Bank analyses of gender and ICT access in Africa in the late 2000s tended to focus on economic empowerment — mobile money, mobile commerce, access to price information for small-scale traders. This framing was analytically valuable and practically important, but it did not fully capture the science and technology dimension that concerned organisations like WIGSAT. The African Development Bank, which was increasingly investing in university infrastructure, represented a potentially more relevant locus of policy advocacy for the research-connectivity dimension of the ICT access question.
The case for investment was straightforward: the return on a woman with a PhD in chemistry who could participate fully in international research collaborations was compounding and long-term, not only for her career but for the institutions she trained at and returned to, the students she mentored, and the science that benefited from a more diverse set of contributors. This was not a welfare argument but an efficiency argument — and it was one that development economics was beginning to make more systematically as the data on women's education returns became more robust.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the "ICT access gap" for women in Africa?
The ICT access gap refers to the disparity between men and women in access to information and communication technologies — including mobile phones, internet connectivity, and research computing infrastructure. In Sub-Saharan Africa circa 2009, the gap in mobile phone access was narrowing but the gap in internet access, and particularly in research-grade connectivity, remained very wide.
Why does ICT access matter specifically for women scientists?
Participation in modern scientific research requires reliable, high-quality internet connectivity for access to journal databases, collaboration with international research partners, and use of computational tools. Women researchers at under-resourced African universities faced compounded disadvantages: institutional underfunding affected everyone, but gender dynamics within institutions meant women were often last in line for access to the limited connectivity that did exist.
How did Kenya, South Africa, and Nigeria compare in 2009?
South Africa had the most developed research infrastructure and highest internet penetration of the three, but with severe internal inequalities between historically advantaged and disadvantaged institutions. Kenya showed rapid mobile growth but very limited research-grade connectivity. Nigeria's scale made it the largest single case, but its university infrastructure suffered from chronic underfunding that compounded gender barriers for women in science.
← Back to Guides | GASAT 12: Climate, Sustainability, and the Women-in-Science Agenda →