Editorial historical reference

This page provides editorial commentary on a historical coordinating body. WIGSAT (Women Inspiring Girls in STEM, Advancement & Training) is an editorial directory and is not affiliated with, nor a successor to, the Gender Advisory Board or any of its working groups. References are for editorial historical purposes only.

The GAB Global Working Group: An Editorial History

Editorial commentary on a historical coordinating mechanism

Topic
The Global Working Group of the Gender Advisory Board, active circa 1995-2010
Convening body
The Gender Advisory Board (GAB), historical advisory body to UNCSTD
Primary source
Archived materials at the Internet Archive Wayback Machine

What the Working Group was

During the late 1990s and 2000s, the Gender Advisory Board (GAB) - an advisory body convened to support the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development - operated several coordinating mechanisms intended to bridge international research, intergovernmental policy, and field-level practice on gender equity in science and technology. The most active of these was an informal coordinating circle commonly referred to as the Global Working Group. This page provides a brief editorial history for readers who encounter a citation to that group in present-day literature.

Who participated

The Working Group's membership drew from academic researchers, UN-system staff (notably from UNECA, UNESCO and UNDP), bilateral aid agencies, and a small number of NGOs working on gender and international science policy. Participants were drawn from Africa, Asia, Latin America and Europe; the geographic spread was a deliberate response to the perception that earlier policy conversations on gender and S&T had been dominated by voices from OECD countries.

What the Working Group produced

Output took three principal forms. The first was a set of position papers prepared for submission into UNCSTD plenary sessions and related intergovernmental processes. The second was a series of meeting summaries circulated to a wider mailing list of researchers and policy professionals. The third was a small number of collaborative reference documents - typically short, focused on a single policy question such as the integration of gender into national science and technology indicators - intended for use by national science ministries and donor agencies.

Across these outputs, three recurring concerns are visible in the archived material: integrating gender analysis into national S&T indicators; ensuring that international technical-assistance programmes addressed gender equity as an operational priority rather than a compliance requirement; and creating channels by which women scientists and engineers from developing countries could be represented in global policy dialogues.

Why the Working Group is sometimes cited today

Present-day literature on gender, science and innovation policy occasionally cites Working Group documents either as primary-source evidence of the policy framing used in the late 1990s and 2000s, or as part of the documentary record on multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms in research policy. Readers consulting those citations should refer to the archived documents themselves, preserved at the Internet Archive Wayback Machine.

Related editorial pages